急诊治疗重症心力衰竭的方案及疗效探析

目的探讨急诊治疗重症心力衰竭的方案及疗效。方法选择本院80例2016年2月-2019年2月重症心力衰竭患者。随机分组,常规治疗组采取常规方法治疗,急诊治疗组则采取全面急诊治疗。比较两组重症心力衰竭疗效;重症心力衰竭症状改善的时间、心功能改善两级的时间;治疗前后患者舒张压、平均心率以及左心射血分数;不良反应。结果急诊治疗组重症心力衰竭疗效、重症心力衰竭症状改善的时间、心功能改善两级的时间、舒张压、平均心率以及左心射血分数相比较常规治疗组更好,P<0.05。两组未见严重不良反应,P>0.05。结论全面急诊治疗重症心力衰竭可获得较好预后,可有效改善患者的心功能,缓解症状,且安全性高,无明显不良反应。     

急诊住院医师的教学查房模式

教学查房是床旁教学的一种重要手段,对住院医师进行教学查房能够有效提高住院医师的岗位胜任力和职业能力,培养急诊住院医师的急诊临床思维。近年来由于国家住院医师规范化培训改革在不断深入,对急诊住院医师的教学查房引起了人们的高度关注,然后在实际的急诊住院医师的教学查房中却还存在着诸多问题,教学查房与日常的临床查房概念混淆、教学查房准备不充分、教学查房目的不明确以及教学查房的互动性不强都严重影响了教学查房的质量。因此需要积极探究急诊住院医师的教学查房的有效模式,从而不断提升住院医师的临床实践能力。     

急诊科急性心肌梗死患者抢救中优化急诊护理流程应用效果分析

目的:研讨急性心肌梗死患者行优化急诊护理流程的临床效果。方法:摘取单县中医医院2017年8月-2018年11月接收的110例急性心肌梗死患者资料,55例行优化急诊护理流程(研究组),55例行常规护理流程(对照组),比对两组临床指标与心理状态。结果:研究组接诊、术后转运、抢救准备及分诊台停留所用的时间(8.30±2.01)min、(14.67±2.53)min、(7.43±1.19)min、(2.01±0.44)min比对照组短,且抑郁自评量表(Self-rating Depression Scale,SDS)与焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)评分(40.03±2.36)分、(41.75±1.18)分比对照组低(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。结论:在抢救中给予急性心肌梗死患者优化急诊护理流程能改善其负面情绪,缩短接诊、术后转运、抢救准备等所用的时间。     

Intranasal hydromorphone for treatment of acute pain in children: A pilot study

ObjectivesWe aimed to describe the analgesic efficacy, duration of analgesia, and adverse event profile associated with intranasal hydromorphone in children with acute pain presenting to an emergency department.MethodsProspective dose titration pilot study of otherwise healthy children 4 to 17-years-old with moderate to severe pain who required a parenteral opioid. All patients received an initial intranasal hydromorophone dose of 0.03 mg/kg. The need for additional analgesia was assessed at 15 and 30 min; an additional 0.015 mg/kg was given at each assessment, if required. Need for rescue analgesic, pain intensity and adverse events were assessed until 6 h after hydromorphone administration or until patients were discharged, underwent a procedure to treat their painful condition, or received a rescue analgesic.ResultsWe enrolled 35 children. Fifteen, 11, and 9 children required a total dose of 0.03, 0.045, and 0.06 mg/kg, respectively. Patients in each dose group experienced an absolute decrease in pain score of ≥3/10 and percent reduction >40% within 5–15 min of completing dose-titration administration of hydromorphone. Duration of analgesia (i.e. time until rescue analgesic administered) >1 h was observed in 85.7% of patients. Patients not requiring rescue analgesics had mild or no pain until discharged or their painful conditions were treated. Three (8.6%) patients required a rescue analgesic <1 h after hydromorphone administration. There were no major adverse events.ConclusionsIntranasal hydromorphone led to rapid, clinically significant and frequently sustained decreases in pain intensity in children. No major adverse events were observed in this preliminary sample.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02437669     

Trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization for emergency department syncope care before and after ACEP clinical policy

ObjectivesTo describe recent trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization of emergency department (ED) syncope patients, both considered “low-value”, and examine trend changes before and after the publication of American College Emergency Physician (ACEP) syncope guidelines in 2007, compared to conditions that had no changes in guideline recommendations.MethodsWe analyzed 2002–2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data using an interrupted-time series with comparison series design. The primary outcomes were advanced imaging among ED visits with principal diagnosis of syncope and headache and hospitalization for ED visits with principal diagnosis of syncope, chest pain, dysrhythmia, and pneumonia. We adjusted annual imaging and hospitalization rates using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression, controlling for demographic and visit characteristics. Using adjusted outcomes as datapoints, we compared linear trends and trend changes of annual imaging and hospitalization rates before and after 2007 with aggregate-level multivariable linear regression.ResultsFrom 2002 to 2007, advanced imaging rates for syncope increased from 27.2% to 42.1% but had no significant trend after 2007 (trend change: ?3.1%; 95%CI ?4.7, ?1.6). Hospitalization rates remained at approximately 37% from 2002 to 2007 but declined to 25.7% by 2015 (trend change: ?2.2%; 95%CI ?3.0, ?1.4). Similar trend changes occurred among control conditions versus syncope, including advanced imaging for headache (difference in trend change: ?0.6%; 95%CI ?2.8, 1.6) and hospitalizations for chest pain, dysrhythmia, and pneumonia (differences in trend changes: 0.1% [95%CI ?1.9, 2.0]; ?0.9% [95%CI ?3.1, 1.3]; and ?1.2% [95%CI ?5.3, 2.9], respectively).ConclusionsBefore and after the release of 2007 ACEP syncope guidelines, trends in advanced imaging and hospitalization for ED syncope visits had similar changes compared to control conditions. Changes in syncope care may, therefore, reflect broader practice shifts rather than a direct association with the 2007 ACEP guideline. Moreover, utilization of advanced imaging remains prevalent. To reduce low-value care, policymakers should augment society guidelines with additional policy changes such as reportable quality measures.